Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid C. Lin
contributor authorEmilios K. Dimitriadis
contributor authorFerenc Horkay
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:22:40Z
date available2017-05-09T00:22:40Z
date copyrightDecember, 2007
date issued2007
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-26773#904_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/135198
description abstractIn the first of this two-part discourse on the extraction of elastic properties from atomic force microscopy (AFM) data, a scheme for automating the analysis of force-distance curves was introduced and experimentally validated for the Hertzian (i.e., linearly elastic and noninteractive probe-sample pairs) indentation of soft, inhomogeneous materials. In the presence of probe-sample adhesive interactions, which are common especially during retraction of the rigid tip from soft materials, the Hertzian models are no longer adequate. A number of theories (e.g., Johnson–Kendall–Roberts and Derjaguin–Muller–Toporov), covering the full range of sample compliance relative to adhesive force and tip radius, are available for analysis of such data. We incorporated Pietrement and Troyon’s approximation (2000, “ General Equations Describing Elastic Indentation Depth and Normal Contact Stiffness Versus Load,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 226(1), pp. 166–171) of the Maugis–Dugdale model into the automated procedure. The scheme developed for the processing of Hertzian data was extended to allow for adhesive contact by applying the Pietrement–Troyon equation. Retraction force-displacement data from the indentation of polyvinyl alcohol gels were processed using the customized software. Many of the retraction curves exhibited strong adhesive interactions that were absent in extension. We compared the values of Young’s modulus extracted from the retraction data to the values obtained from the extension data and from macroscopic uniaxial compression tests. Application of adhesive contact models and the automated scheme to the retraction curves yielded average values of Young’s modulus close to those obtained with Hertzian models for the extension curves. The Pietrement–Troyon equation provided a good fit to the data as indicated by small values of the mean-square error. The Maugis–Dugdale theory is capable of accurately modeling adhesive contact between a rigid spherical indenter and a soft, elastic sample. Pietrement and Troyon’s empirical equation greatly simplifies the theory and renders it compatible with the general automation strategies that we developed for Hertzian analysis. Our comprehensive algorithm for automated extraction of Young’s moduli from AFM indentation data has been expanded to recognize the presence of either adhesive or Hertzian behavior and apply the appropriate contact model.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleRobust Strategies for Automated AFM Force Curve Analysis—II: Adhesion-Influenced Indentation of Soft, Elastic Materials
typeJournal Paper
journal volume129
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2800826
journal fristpage904
journal lastpage912
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsForce
keywordsAdhesives
keywordsAtomic force microscopy
keywordsEquations
keywordsFittings
keywordsDisplacement AND Algorithms
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record