Show simple item record

contributor authorR. Padmaja
contributor authorP. B. Godbole
contributor authorR. Ravinder Rao
contributor authorB. Kotiveerachari
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:17:05Z
date available2017-05-09T00:17:05Z
date copyrightNovember, 2005
date issued2005
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier otherJMDEDB-27816#1207_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/132259
description abstractThe present work is aimed at evaluating different ways in which a given joint can be analyzed using the Finite Element Method. The bolt is modeled using line elements (link) or area elements (continuum) and a comparative evaluation is carried out. Each of these types is further subdivided into three categories viz., plane stress, axisymmetric, and three-dimensional models. Thus a total of six models are proposed to be analyzed and compared. As the bolt shares only a small fraction of external load in a well-tightened joint, the relative flexibility of a bracket is also studied as an example in the present work. Comparing the results of these analyses it was found that the type of model used for the bolt is more important than the type of analysis. This aspect is probed further to find the essential difference between bolt as link and bolt as continuum. The analysis is carried out using ANSYS, which enables writing many parametric programs.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparative Evaluation of Finite Element Models and Types of Analyses for a Bolted Joint
typeJournal Paper
journal volume127
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.2118647
journal fristpage1207
journal lastpage1210
identifier eissn1528-9001
keywordsStress
keywordsPlasticity
keywordsFinite element model
keywordsTension
keywordsStiffness AND Bolted joints
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2005:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record