Show simple item record

contributor authorSteven Kmenta
contributor authorKoshuke Ishii
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:13:48Z
date available2017-05-09T00:13:48Z
date copyrightNovember, 2004
date issued2004
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier otherJMDEDB-27795#1027_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/130449
description abstractFailure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) uses the product of three ranked factors to compute the risk priority number (RPN). Unfortunately, the RPN components have ambiguous definitions, and multiplying ranked values is not a valid operation. As a result, the RPN produces inconsistent risk priorities. In addition, FMEA uses distinct analyses for each system level and life cycle phase, making it difficult to consolidate interrelated risk information. The goal of scenario-based FMEA is to delineate and evaluate risk events more accurately. Probability and cost provide a consistent basis for risk analysis and decision making, and failure scenarios provide continuity across system levels and life cycle phases.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleScenario-Based Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Using Expected Cost
typeJournal Paper
journal volume126
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.1799614
journal fristpage1027
journal lastpage1035
identifier eissn1528-9001
keywordsFailure mode and effects analysis
keywordsFailure AND Probability
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record