Show simple item record

contributor authorS. Bhandari
contributor authorJ.-M. Bergheau
contributor authorP. Dupas
contributor authorL. Nicolas
contributor authorG. Mottet
contributor authorX. Feral
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:03:09Z
date available2017-05-09T00:03:09Z
date copyrightNovember, 2000
date issued2000
identifier issn0094-9930
identifier otherJPVTAS-28404#408_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/124172
description abstractNumerical simulation of creep rupture of a reactor pressure vessel in a severe hypothetical accident needs to perfectly take account of interactions between creep phenomena and damage. The continuous damage theory enables to formulate models strongly coupling elasto-visco-plasticity and damage. Such models have been implemented in various computer codes and, in particular, in ASTER at Electricité de France, CASTEM 2000 at Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique and SYSTUS+® at SYSTUS International. The objective of this paper is to present briefly a validation study of the three different numerical implementations and to compare the coupled approach to an uncoupled one on an example of a cylinder of the program “RUPTHER,” under internal pressure and heated to a temperature of 700°C. [S0094-9930(00)01004-0]
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleCreep-Damage Analysis: Comparison Between Coupled and Uncoupled Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume122
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.1310364
journal fristpage408
journal lastpage412
identifier eissn1528-8978
keywordsCreep
keywordsTemperature
keywordsStress
keywordsRupture
keywordsDeformation
keywordsAccidents
keywordsCylinders AND Reactor vessels
treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record