Show simple item record

contributor authorD. R. Keyser
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:57:00Z
date available2017-05-08T23:57:00Z
date copyrightMarch, 1998
date issued1998
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherJFEGA4-27126#19_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/120667
description abstractThere are two axioms applicable to this paper: the first is that no flowmeter can be more accurate than the laboratory which calibrated it; the second that no uncalibrated flowmeter can be more accurate than a like one that is calibrated in a recognized standards laboratory. The fundamental systematic uncertainty in flow measurement is that inherited from the flow calibration laboratory. This paper focuses on ascertaining this fundamental systematic uncertainty by deriving from the published instances of interlaboratory comparisons a value in which one may be 95 percent confident. For water flow measurements, this value turns out to be ±0.28 percent, and for liquid hydrocarbon fuels it is ±0.77 percent. Cold water calibrations are the most accurate.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleThe Systematic Uncertainty of Laboratory Flow Calibrations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume120
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.2819647
journal fristpage19
journal lastpage22
identifier eissn1528-901X
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsCalibration
keywordsUncertainty
keywordsFlow measurement
keywordsWater
keywordsFlowmeters AND Fuels
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record