Show simple item record

contributor authorG. E. Kouba
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:56:26Z
date available2017-05-08T23:56:26Z
date copyrightMarch, 1998
date issued1998
identifier issn0195-0738
identifier otherJERTD2-26475#56_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/120344
description abstractAt present, no standard of presenting multiphase flow meter (MPFM) uncertainties has been accepted by industry. Consequently, vendors’ specifications may only indicate velocity and component fraction uncertainties, while customers will typically need to know the overall uncertainty of the hydrocarbon (gas or oil) flow rate. Moreover, comparisons between different meters, meter locations, and metering strategies are difficult without the combined uncertainties of the hydrocarbon measurement. A simple uncertainty analysis (UA) is presented as a means of combining individual measurement uncertainties to determine an overall uncertainty for one of the mixture components, e.g., oil rate. The results are displayed as contour lines of constant oil rate uncertainty on plots of gas fraction versus water cut. Examples illustrate how the uncertainty of oil rate measurement might be reduced by operating the meter at higher pressure, or employing partial separation strategies, and limitations of such strategies.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleA New Look at Measurement Uncertainty of Multiphase Flow Meters
typeJournal Paper
journal volume120
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.2795010
journal fristpage56
journal lastpage60
identifier eissn1528-8994
keywordsMultiphase flow
keywordsMeasurement uncertainty
keywordsUncertainty
keywordsMixtures
keywordsWater
keywordsPressure
keywordsFlow (Dynamics) AND Separation (Technology)
treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record