Show simple item record

contributor authorS. Genc
contributor authorR. W. Messler
contributor authorP. R. Bonenberger
contributor authorG. A. Gabriele
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:54:13Z
date available2017-05-08T23:54:13Z
date copyrightJune, 1997
date issued1997
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier otherJMDEDB-27645#178_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/119119
description abstractThe proliferation of plastic in parts, and the ability to mold such parts of great complexity at little cost penalty, has resulted in the growing use of integral attachment in the form of snap-fit features in designs. Heretofore, the great diversity in geometry of mating parts and of available integral attachment snap-fit features (e.g., cantilever hooks, compression traps, bayonet-fingers, etc.) has made it appear that assembly design possibilities may be unbounded, and that attempts at optimization might be intractable. This paper enumerates all possible assembly design options using a hierarchical classification scheme. In so doing, it guides new designers and validates choices for experienced ones. The result is great order and simplicity that facilitates better understanding of this assembly joining method, better communication, development of design aids, and improved and extended attachment performance.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleEnumerating Possible Design Options for Integral Attachment Using a Hierarchical Classification Scheme
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.2826233
journal fristpage178
journal lastpage184
identifier eissn1528-9001
keywordsDesign
keywordsManufacturing
keywordsSnap fitting
keywordsJoining
keywordsOptimization
keywordsCantilevers
keywordsCompression AND Geometry
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record