Show simple item record

contributor authorJ. A. C. Kentfield
contributor authorM. O’Blenes
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:27:05Z
date available2017-05-08T23:27:05Z
date copyrightOctober, 1988
date issued1988
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier otherJETPEZ-26660#704_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/103840
description abstractThe objective of the work was to compare on both an ideal and, where possible, an actual basis the approximate performances of four types of pressure-gain combustor. Such combustors are potentially suitable for use in gas turbines in place of conventional steady-flow combustors. The ideal theoretical performance comparison was based on a specially conceived, universal, analytical model capable of representing, in a fundamental manner, the dominant features of each of the systems studied. The comparisons of nonideal performance were based on actual test results and, where these were not available, on ideal performance characteristics suitably modified to take irreversibilities, etc., into account. It was found that in general the pressure-gain potential of the concepts studied increased with increasing system complexity. It was also found that with most concepts the combustor pressure ratio achievable increases with combustor temperature ratio.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleMethods for Achieving a Combustion-Driven Pressure Gain in Gas Turbines
typeJournal Paper
journal volume110
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.3240195
journal fristpage704
journal lastpage711
identifier eissn0742-4795
keywordsPressure
keywordsCombustion
keywordsGas turbines
keywordsCombustion chambers
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsTemperature AND Performance characterization
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1988:;volume( 110 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record