Show simple item record

contributor authorR. Peek
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:20:57Z
date available2017-05-08T23:20:57Z
date copyrightNovember, 1985
date issued1985
identifier issn0094-9930
identifier otherJPVTAS-28261#356_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/100252
description abstractEnergy balance methods commonly in use for the design of pipe whip restraints are based on the solution for the motion of a rigid-plastic pipe before impact against the restraint, with the assumption that after impact, the whipping portion of the pipe continues to rotate about the plastic hinge location determined for conditions before impact. Such energy balance methods are not necessarily conservative because: 1) the plastic hinge which forms in the pipe moves after impact on the restraint; and 2) elastic pipe deformations are not considered. Here, upper and lower bounds to the required restraint capacity are derived. In contrast to finite element methods, which are very time-consuming, the upper and lower bounds can be evaluated by simple hand calculations. Another advantage is that the required restraint capacity is calculated directly. No trial and error design is required. A numerical example shows that for a typical pipe and restraint, the upper and lower bounds differ by as little as 20 percent.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titlePipe Whip—Bounding the Required Restraint Capacity
typeJournal Paper
journal volume107
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.3264465
journal fristpage356
journal lastpage360
identifier eissn1528-8978
keywordsPipes
keywordsDesign
keywordsEnergy budget (Physics)
keywordsHinges
keywordsFinite element methods
keywordsDeformation
keywordsMotion AND Errors
treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1985:;volume( 107 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record