Show simple item record

contributor authorC. R. Boër
contributor authorW. D. Webster
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:20:39Z
date available2017-05-08T23:20:39Z
date copyrightAugust, 1985
date issued1985
identifier issn1087-1357
identifier otherJMSEFK-27714#254_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/100097
description abstractThe paper presents a direct comparison between two modeling techniques of metal forming processes, in the present case wire drawing. The two methods have the same basic approach in using the Upper-Bound Theorem but the solution methods are fundamentally different. One method is a direct analytical solution requiring the knowledge of a kinematically admissible velocity field, the other method uses a finite element approach and calculation of the velocities at the nodes of the mesh. Both methods minimize the power required. The theoretical fundamentals of the two methods, the solution approaches and the results are presented and compared. The advantages and disadvantages of both methods are also analysed.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleDirect Upper-Bound Solution and Finite Element Approach to Round-To-Square Drawing
typeJournal Paper
journal volume107
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.3185995
journal fristpage254
journal lastpage260
identifier eissn1528-8935
keywordsFinite element analysis
keywordsModeling
keywordsTheorems (Mathematics)
keywordsMetalworking AND Wire drawing
treeJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1985:;volume( 107 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record