| contributor author | C. R. Boër | |
| contributor author | W. D. Webster | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:20:39Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:20:39Z | |
| date copyright | August, 1985 | |
| date issued | 1985 | |
| identifier issn | 1087-1357 | |
| identifier other | JMSEFK-27714#254_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/100097 | |
| description abstract | The paper presents a direct comparison between two modeling techniques of metal forming processes, in the present case wire drawing. The two methods have the same basic approach in using the Upper-Bound Theorem but the solution methods are fundamentally different. One method is a direct analytical solution requiring the knowledge of a kinematically admissible velocity field, the other method uses a finite element approach and calculation of the velocities at the nodes of the mesh. Both methods minimize the power required. The theoretical fundamentals of the two methods, the solution approaches and the results are presented and compared. The advantages and disadvantages of both methods are also analysed. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Direct Upper-Bound Solution and Finite Element Approach to Round-To-Square Drawing | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 107 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3185995 | |
| journal fristpage | 254 | |
| journal lastpage | 260 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8935 | |
| keywords | Finite element analysis | |
| keywords | Modeling | |
| keywords | Theorems (Mathematics) | |
| keywords | Metalworking AND Wire drawing | |
| tree | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1985:;volume( 107 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |