YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    LES Model Sensitivities to Domains, Grids, and Large-Eddy Timescales

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1999:;Volume( 056 ):;issue: 004::page 599
    Author:
    Agee, Ernest
    ,
    Gluhovsky, Alexander
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0599:LMSTDG>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: This study has addressed the sensitivity of large-eddy simulation (LES) models to domain size, grid resolution, and the number of large-eddy turnover times (t?) of integration, and their respective effects on the characteristic turbulence statistics computed from the simulation of convective flows in planetary boundary layers (PBLs). This includes the review of relevant results from past LES studies, as well as new findings using LES models for Type I cloud-topped boundary layers with ice and snow. Horizontal domains in this study were varied from 5 km ? 5 km to 10 km ? 10 km, grid length varied from 125 m ? 125 m to 78 m ? 78 m, and three t? times of 11, 15, and 19. Adequate results for horizontal variance were obtained for the 10 km ? 10 km domain, the 78 m ? 78 m grid, and all the t? values, based on the evaluation criteria introduced to replace the time-averaging methodology. Similar results were found for vertical velocity skewness; however, 19t? offered improvement over 11t? and 15t?, showing sensitivity of model simulations to length of time integration as well as domain and grid sizes (especially for higher-order moments). Results are also presented to explain the discrepancy between LES model turbulence statistics and those calculated from field observations of convective PBLs. Recognizing that field data, in essence, have no domain size and grid-resolution restrictions, Project Lake Effect Snow Studies data over Lake Michigan were subjected to a high-pass filter (ranging from 0.5 to 5 km), which corresponds to removing the effects of larger-scale components not adequately represented by the limited domain of LES models. Turbulence statistics (such as vertical velocity skewness) derived from the filtered field data are seen to be rendered more compatible with LES model statistical results.
    • Download: (84.53Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      LES Model Sensitivities to Domains, Grids, and Large-Eddy Timescales

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4158704
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAgee, Ernest
    contributor authorGluhovsky, Alexander
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:35:17Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:35:17Z
    date copyright1999/02/01
    date issued1999
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-22272.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4158704
    description abstractThis study has addressed the sensitivity of large-eddy simulation (LES) models to domain size, grid resolution, and the number of large-eddy turnover times (t?) of integration, and their respective effects on the characteristic turbulence statistics computed from the simulation of convective flows in planetary boundary layers (PBLs). This includes the review of relevant results from past LES studies, as well as new findings using LES models for Type I cloud-topped boundary layers with ice and snow. Horizontal domains in this study were varied from 5 km ? 5 km to 10 km ? 10 km, grid length varied from 125 m ? 125 m to 78 m ? 78 m, and three t? times of 11, 15, and 19. Adequate results for horizontal variance were obtained for the 10 km ? 10 km domain, the 78 m ? 78 m grid, and all the t? values, based on the evaluation criteria introduced to replace the time-averaging methodology. Similar results were found for vertical velocity skewness; however, 19t? offered improvement over 11t? and 15t?, showing sensitivity of model simulations to length of time integration as well as domain and grid sizes (especially for higher-order moments). Results are also presented to explain the discrepancy between LES model turbulence statistics and those calculated from field observations of convective PBLs. Recognizing that field data, in essence, have no domain size and grid-resolution restrictions, Project Lake Effect Snow Studies data over Lake Michigan were subjected to a high-pass filter (ranging from 0.5 to 5 km), which corresponds to removing the effects of larger-scale components not adequately represented by the limited domain of LES models. Turbulence statistics (such as vertical velocity skewness) derived from the filtered field data are seen to be rendered more compatible with LES model statistical results.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleLES Model Sensitivities to Domains, Grids, and Large-Eddy Timescales
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume56
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0599:LMSTDG>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage599
    journal lastpage604
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1999:;Volume( 056 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian